Mitsubishi Pajero from ANCAP Crash Test

|

Sunday, May 1, 2011



Occupant Protection Score
28.41 out of 37
Pedestrian Protection Rating
2 out of 36
Poor
MakeMitsubishi
ModelPajero
CategoryLarge SUV
Body TypeSUV
VariantGL
Tested Vehicles Built2010
Airbags (if supplied)Dual front, side + head-protecting side curtains
Engine size3.8 diesel, manual L
Kerb Weight2270 kg
Test Date16 March 2011
Tested ByANCAP

 

Model History and Safety Features

 

The tested model of Mitsubishi Pajero was introduced in Australia during 2006. This 4 star ANCAP rating applies to all variants, with or without side airbags and curtains.

Dual front airbags, side airbags and head-protecting side curtains are now standard equipment. Antilock brakes (ABS), electronic brake distribution (EBD) and electronic stability control (ESC) are also standard. An advanced seat belt reminder is fitted to the driver seat. A reversing camera is available for some variants.


Pretensioners are fitted to the front seat belts to reduce slack in the event of a crash. A three point seat belt is fitted to the centre rear seat. This provides better protection than a two point (lap) seat belt. 

 

Occupant protection: 4 stars

The Pajero scored 11.41 out of 16 in the offset crash test. The passenger compartment held its shape reasonably well. Protection from serious leg injury was marginal for the driver.

The vehicle was awarded a default score of 16 out of 16 in the side impact crash test. 

Frontal offset crash test

 

Mitsubishi Pajero injury outcomes
Body region scores out of 4 points each: Head/neck 4 pts, chest 3.90 pts, upper legs 2 pts, lower legs 1.51 pts.

The passenger compartment held its shape reasonably well in the offset crash test. There were signs of loss of integrity for the a-pillar and driver's door and rupture of the footwell. The clutch pedal moved rearwards by 130 mm and upwards 66 mm. The steering wheel hub moved 16 mm rearward, 68 mm upward and 13 mm sideways. The front ("A") pillar moved 41 mm rearwards. All doors remained closed during the crash. After the crash the driver’s door could be opened with high manual effort. The tailshaft moved sideways and contacted the fuel tank shield. The tank was undamaged.


The airbag cushioned the head of the driver and contact was stable. Steering column components were a potential source of injury for the driver's knees. The passenger's head was cushioned by the airbag.

Side impact crash test

 

Body region scores out of 4 points each: Head 4 pts, chest 4 pts, abdomen 4 pts, pelvis 4 pts.

The side impact test normally used by ANCAP simulates a small car striking the driver's door of the vehicle under test. It is based on a regulation test but the regulation does not apply to vehicles with a high seat height like the Pajero. Experience shows that such vehicles can be expected to perform well in this test so ANCAP has decided to award full score for these vehicles instead of conducting a crash test. No pole test was conducted. 

 

Pedestrian protection: poor

 

All areas except the middle of the bumper performed poorly. 


Modifiers - Offset test scores

 

HeadNo deduction
ChestNo deduction
Upper leg2 pt deduction Left & Right
Lower legNo deduction
Foot scorePedal displacement and footwell rupture -score 1.8 points
Note: Steering column and pedal movements are measured relative to the driver's seat.

Other Modifiers

 

Default score awarded

Safety Features

 

Driver airbagS
Antilock (ABS) brakes / Electronic brake distributionS/S/S
Passenger front airbagS
Electronic stability control (ESC, VSC, DSc, ESP, VSA)S#
Side airbags, front seats - chest protectionS
3 point centre rear seat beltS
Side airbags, front seats - head protectionS
Side airbags, rear seats - head protectionS
Intelligent seat belt reminder - driverS
Intelligent seat belt reminder - front passengerX
Whiplash protection (RCAR protocol)Pending
Driver knee airbagX
Front/rear seat belt pretensionersS
Rear seat belt status indicatorX
Key:
√ = Fitted to vehicle that was crash tested (where not standard)
S = standard on all models
S* = Standard for petrol models but not available for LPG models until 1 May 2009
O = optional on base variant. May be standard on higher variants
V = not available on base variant but standard or optional on higher variants
X = not available on any variant.
* = not available on the Australian model
# ESC required by ANCAP for 5 star rating from 2008. 
  

Injury Measurements

 

Refer to the information sheet "How the tests are done"

Offset Crash Test
at 64 km/h
(v4.1)

Side Impact
Crash at
50 km/h
(v4.1)

 

Driver

Passenger

Driver

Head

HIC231302Default score awarded
Acceleration (g for 3ms)41.241.9Default score awarded 
Head Injury Criterion (HIC) is a measure of the potential for head injury. At a HIC of 1000 one in 6 adults will suffer from life-threatening injury to their brain.

 

Neck

Shear (kN)0.600.58Default score awarded
Tension (kN)0.841.29Default score awarded
Extension (Nm)11.724.9Default score awarded

Chest

Acceleration (g for 3ms)48.30033.600Default score awarded
Compression (mm)22.7319.90Default score awarded
Viscous Criterion (m/s)0.070.05Default score awarded
Chest compression of 75 or more, or chest acceleration of 90 or more indicates poor protection from serious chest injury.

 

Abdomen

Force (kN)  Default score awarded

Pelvis

Force (kN)  Default score awarded

 

Upper Legs

 

Force Left (kN)0.130.38 
Force Right (kN)0.251.37 
Knee Disp. Left (mm)0.140.10 
Knee Disp. Right (mm)0.054.65 
An upper leg axial force of 10.9 or more indicates poor protection from serious upper leg (femur) injury.

 

Lower Legs

 

Force Left (kN)1.421.55 
Force Right (kN)2.161.66 
Index (upper/lower) Left0.27/0.960.8/0.15 
Index (upper/lower) Right0.44/0.230.35/0.38 
A lower leg index of 1.2 or more indicates poor protection from serious lower leg (tibia) injury.

 

Bonus points (maximum 5):

Pole test:Not testedSeat belt reminders:1 pont

Pedestrian rating

 

Child head impactsZeroUpper leg impactsZero
Adult head impactsZeroLower leg impacts2
Total2 out of 36 Poor   



0 comments:

Post a Comment